[Bug 623606] Review Request: gxneur - GTK front-end for X Neural Switcher

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 17 16:02:46 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623606

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan at hubbitus.info> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dwmw2 at infradead.org
          Component|Package Review              |0xFFFF

--- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan at hubbitus.info> 2010-11-17 11:02:45 EST ---
Thanks for the comments.

License changed to GPL22+

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > - I think the description maybe a bit problematic. The Packaging Guidelines
> > state that a phrasing like "a program like ..." should be avoided since people
> > might understand you wrong (or might _want_ to understand you wrong) when it
> > comes to trademarks. 
> 
> I agree -- a more detailed description would be nice. Without further
> investigation, I don't really understand what the program does.
Ok, mention of Punto switcher removed. In summary added name of package to what
frontend intended.

(In reply to comment #4)
> After having a closer look at the package I would like to point out the
> following things:
> - The files TODO and README are included in the package. However, they are 
>   empty (already in the source tarball). I see no point in including these 
>   files then. Maybe you can ask upstream if this is a mistake.
It may be filled in further releases.

> - If you update the version of the software you should reset the release number to 1
Is it required? I prefer enumerate releases through all updates.
> - As far as I can tell it is not necessary to require xneur, this dependency is 
>   found automagically during the build process.
No, versioned demendency is not pulled, please see:
$ rpm -qp --requires
'http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2606337&name=gxneur-0.10.0-2.fc15.i686.rpm'

It depend only from libxnconfig.so.10 and libxneur.so.10, but I require also
exactly the same version.

> - The icon tag in the .desktop file should not have an explicit file extension 
>   (.png here)
Fixed.

> Furthermore, Martin (from comment #3) hinted me at the following points:
> - the autotools (autoconf, automake, autoheader, libtool, ...) are only needed
> when existing configure.ac or Makefile.am files are changed. This is not the
> case here and so they don't have to be included.
Removed.
> - It would be better to be more precise in the %file section. Excessive
> globbing might lead to unwanted files being packaged. So it would be better to
> make the following changes:
> %{_bindir}/*         =>    %{_bindir}/gxneur                            
> %{_mandir}/man?/*    =>    %{_mandir}/man1/gxneur.1*
Ok.

Additionally add BR GConf2-devel to build in rawhide.

http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/gxneur/gxneur-0.10.0-3.fc13.src.rpm
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora13/gxneur/gxneur.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list