[Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 18 05:00:29 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425
Ruediger Landmann <r.landmann at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(aleksey at oscada.or
| |g.ua)
--- Comment #40 from Ruediger Landmann <r.landmann at redhat.com> 2010-11-18 00:00:27 EST ---
Hi Aleksey --
Much better! Thank you!
The two other issues in there are:
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type in spec file: GPLv2
Files in package state "GNU General Public License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any
later version". Therefore:
License: GPLv2+
[!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
* md5sums do not match:
$ md5sum SOURCES/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
9b7de3d45da769ae058ac06318c56c54 SOURCES/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
$ md5sum ~/Download/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
310a7e16017290232183753d73f3559d /home/rlandmann/Download/lightsquid-1.8.tgz
* Please express Source0 as:
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
(preferred format according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net )
---
I also made a mistake about file ownership in the review; please disregard.
There is of course no problem here. :)
One last thing: improvements to my suggested wording for the descriptions:
%description
%{name} is a small and fast Squid log analyzer.
%description apache
%{name} configuration files and scripts for Apache.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list