[Bug 653682] Review Request: jemalloc - General-purpose scalable concurrent malloc(3) implementation

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 18 17:47:12 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653682

Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> 2010-11-18 12:47:11 EST ---
Hi Ingvar,

you should have bumped the Release number. ;-)
Besides that, the package looks fine now, and we can finish here.

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-x86_64/result/*.rpm
jemalloc.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) malloc -> mallow, Mallorca,
Mallory
jemalloc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US malloc -> mallow,
Mallorca, Mallory
jemalloc.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) malloc -> mallow, Mallorca,
Mallory
jemalloc.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US malloc -> mallow,
Mallorca, Mallory
jemalloc-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/jemalloc.3.gz
65: warning: macro `UR' not defined
jemalloc-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/jemalloc.3.gz
67: warning: macro `UE' not defined
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.

The above warnings can savely be ignored:
- spelling errors are false positive
- undefined groff macros UR/UE don't harm the proper display of the manpage


---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    BSD (2- and 3-clause variants)

[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ md5sum jemalloc-2.0.1.tar.bz2*
    4687f59c073975f39375ece49c402bdc  jemalloc-2.0.1.tar.bz2
    4687f59c073975f39375ece49c402bdc  jemalloc-2.0.1.tar.bz2.1

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
    koji scratch build:
    http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2608809

[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[.] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
    - none required

[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. 
[+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] MUST: library files with a suffix must go in a -devel package.
[+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) ...
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: subpackages other than devel should require the base package
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[+] SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. 

----------------
Package APPROVED
----------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list