[Bug 652085] Review Request: SFML - A simple and fast multimedia library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085

Haïkel Guémar <karlthered at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |karlthered at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |karlthered at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar <karlthered at gmail.com> 2010-11-18 15:04:50 EST ---
* license field should use standard short name: zlib instead of zlib/libpng.
* unversionned shared libraries should go into appropriate devel subpackage
* no %post & %postun for shared libraries subpackages
* incoherent versionning in changelog: use major.minor.revision scheme !
* main package group should be "Development/Libraries"
* any reason not shipping sfml bindings ? at least, you should enable C,
Python, Ruby and D ;)
* what's the status of sfml 1.6 ? are the two branches parallel installable ?
if it's the case, you should consider renaming your package sfml2.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.