[Bug 653049] Review Request: perl-File-Path-Tiny - Recursive versions of mkdir() and rmdir() without as much overhead as File::Path

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653049

Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mmaslano at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2010-11-19 02:35:38 EST ---
- rpmlint checks return: OK
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mkdir -> mk dir,
mk-dir, midiron
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) rmdir -> rm dir,
rm-dir, midiron
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mkdir -> mk
dir, mk-dir, midiron
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rmdir -> rm
dir, rm-dir, midiron
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
perl-File-Path-Tiny.src: W: no-%clean-section
^ false warnings

- package meets naming guidelines OK
- package meets packaging guidelines OK
- license (GPL+ or Artistic) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english OK
- source matches upstream OK
- package compiles on devel (x86) OK
- no missing BR OK
- no unnecessary BR OK
- no locales OK
- not relocatable OK
- owns all directories that it creates OK
- no duplicate files OK
- permissions ok OK
- %clean ok OK
- macro use consistent OK
- code, not content OK
- no need for -docs OK
- nothing in %doc affects runtime OK
- no need for .desktop file  OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.