[Bug 645760] Review Request: django-ajax-selects - Enables editing of ForeignKey, ManyToMany and simple text fields using the Autocomplete - jQuery plugin.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 19 22:25:34 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645760

Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |giallu at gmail.com
             Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)      |
         AssignedTo|guillermo.gomez at gmail.com   |giallu at gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu at gmail.com> 2010-11-19 17:25:33 EST ---
As requested, picking up this review. Also, FE-NEEDSPONSOR is not needed
anymore.

Let's start from the basics.

The md5 for the tarball in your src.rpm does not match the upstream one. Please
be sure to include in the srpm the unmodified tar.gz from upstream. The easiest
way is to use "spectool -g django-ajax-selects.spec" to download it.

Upstream looks a bit confused about licensing: pypi lists lgpl, google code
MIT, while the LICENSE.txt claims it's dual licensed MIT and GPL.

However, what counts is what's actually in the tarball, so please advice him to
include the licenses text in the package and, preferably, add an header on each
source file with the indication of the license.

Our License: tag should be "MIT or GPL+" since dual licensing means you can
choose which one to apply (so the "or") and not stating explicitly which GPL
version to use means you can pick any.

Of course, upstream can consider to clear this up in a later release.

The rest of the spec file looks fine, I'll probably have more remarks after a
build.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list