[Bug 650643] Review Request: cegui06 - CEGUI library 0.6 for apps which need this specific version

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650643

Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #14 from Dan Horák <dan at danny.cz> 2010-11-22 11:03:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > - no diff between the included source archive and the one reproduced with the
> > steps written in spec file
> 
> ? Not sure what you mean here.

just a note how I've compared the sources

> > - I think the version should be 0.6.2b instead of 0.6.2
> 
> Alphanumeric chars in the version are frowned upon / disallowed by the
> guidelines I could add the b to the release field.

OK, let it be as it's now (0.6.2)

> > - there are 3 files in the src/elements directory that are LGPLv2+ licensed,
> > looks like as an omission, the copyright holder is the same as in the MIT
> > licensed files, also it's fixed in 0.7.5, I am not sure what will be the best
> > solution here ...
> 
> I think that given that this is a library, and we're talking LGPL not GPL, that
> it probably is best / easiest to just put "MIT and LGPLv2+" in the license tag.
> Do you agree?

yes

This package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.