[Bug 639278] New: Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 1 11:01:46 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639278

           Summary: Review Request: erlang-lfe - Lisp Flavoured Erlang
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lfe.spec
SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Lisp Flavoured Erlang, is a lisp syntax front-end to the Erlang
compiler. Code produced with it is compatible with "normal" Erlang
code. An LFE evaluator and shell is also included.

One of the requirements ("soft-dependency") for erlang-rebar

koji scratch build for F-14:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2505856

rpmlint:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-lfe-0.6.1-1.fc12.ppc.rpm 
erlang-lfe.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
erlang-lfe.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-lfe.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS

All these messages may be omitted (first one is a false positive due to "lib"
substring in the name of one of the runtime dependency, the rest are due to
fact that arch-independent data is installed into arch-dependent directory)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list