[Bug 639661] New: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Oct 3 03:58:13 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639661
Summary: Review Request: arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs - GNU
Binutils for cross-compilation for ARM target
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: eric at brouhaha.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/review/arm/binutils/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/software/fedora/review/arm/binutils/arm-none-eabi-binutils-cs-2010q1_188-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description:
This is a cross-compilation version of GNU Binutils, which can be used to
assemble and link binaries for the %{target} platform.
This Binutils package is based on the CodeSourcery
%{cs_date}-%{cs_rel} release, which includes improved ARM target
support compared to the corresponding FSF release. CodeSourcery
contributes their changes to the FSF, but it takes a while for them to
get merged. For the ARM target, effectively CodeSourcery is upstream
of FSF.
Note that this is part of a cross-development chain targeting "bare-metal"
development or for use with an embedded RTOS, as opposed to cross-developing
for Linux.
This review request obsoletes an earlier review request for
arm-none-eabi-binutils, bug #565313.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list