[Bug 607584] Review Request: wordgroupz - A vocabulary building application

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607584

--- Comment #23 from Ratnadeep Debnath <rtnpro at gmail.com> 2010-10-16 08:06:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Well, what is pre-release or post-release is actually what
> the upstream (in this case you).
> - If you once released 0.3 and then released 0.3a, then 0.3a is a
>   post-release of 0.3, and when using 0.3a tarball for rpm,
>   you should use "0.3-%{X}.a%{?dist}" for EVR.
> 
> - But in this case you released 0.3a before releasing 0.3. In that case
>   you should use "0.3-0.%{X}.a%{?dist}" for EVR
>   (so please chanage %changelog: Correct one is:
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Fri Jul 23 2010 rtnpro <rtnpro at gmail.com> 0.3-0.1.b
>  - Release version 0.3b
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>   )
Even though it is done, I didn't meant 0.3b to be a pre-release. This was wrong
according to the naming system. I want to fix this, rather than sticking to the
wrong format of name that I used. Please suggest what to do.
I want to name the versions now on as recommended by Fedora packaging
guidelines. Like 0.3.1, 0.3.2, ... , 0.4.0.b, 0.4.1 and so on.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.