[Bug 641018] Review Request: rubygem-nanoc3 - A web publishing system written in Ruby

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018

--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-10-21 13:41:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Some questions first:
> > 
> > * About Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filters/
> >   - Are Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filers always required
> >     for this rpm? 
> >     According to lib/nanoc3/filters.rb, filter scripts under lib/nanoc3/
> >     are loaded only when actually using such filters, and when not
> >     using such filters the listed rpms don't seem to be needed.
> 
> Yes that true. But to guarantee basic functionality for user, 

- So yes, we want to make rpms installed which is needed for "basic"
  functionality on this gem, however are all scripts under lib/nanoc3/filters
  classified as "basic" functionality for this rpm?
  For example, even without the rpms for the dependency of filters
  installed at all, 
  $ ruby -rubygems -e 'require "nanoc3" ; puts Nanoc3::VERSION'
  works.

> it's necessary to
> include that gems. Otherwise functionality that is related 
> with those gems will be not available.

- Just by default. So people can install the needed rpms afterwards
  when people wants to use the functionality.

> And if they are already packaged for Fedora, I can't see the reason for
> omitting them as a dependencies.

- For people not using all of the filter functionality, not using
  unneeded rpms if possible is preferable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.