[Bug 645604] New: Review Request: python-gflags - Commandline flags module for Python

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 21 23:14:27 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: python-gflags - Commandline flags module for Python

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645604

           Summary: Review Request: python-gflags - Commandline flags
                    module for Python
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: Unspecified
        OS/Version: Unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec:
http://github.com/silas/rpms/raw/master/python-gflags/python-gflags.spec

SRPM:
http://github.com/downloads/silas/rpms/python-gflags-1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm

Description:

This project is the python equivalent of google-gflags, a Google commandline
flag implementation for C++. It is intended to be used in situations where a
project wants to mimic the command-line flag handling of a C++ app that uses
google-gflags, or for a Python app that, via swig or some other means, is
linked with a C++ app that uses google-gflags.

The gflags package contains a library that implements commandline flags
processing. As such it's a replacement for getopt(). It has increased
flexibility, including built-in support for Python types, and the ability to
define flags in the source file in which they're used. (This last is its major
difference from OptParse.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list