[Bug 645801] New: Review Request: erlang-gettext - Erlang internationalization library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 22 13:54:04 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: erlang-gettext - Erlang internationalization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645801
Summary: Review Request: erlang-gettext - Erlang
internationalization library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gettext.spec
SRPM URL:
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-gettext-2.1.0-0.1.20101022gitb55cb72.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Erlang internationalization library
Koji scratchbuilds:
F-14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2548678
EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2548688
rpmlint:
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-gettext-2.1.0-0.1.20101022gitb55cb72.fc12.ppc.rpm
erlang-gettext.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-gettext.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
erlang-gettext.ppc: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/erlang-gettext-2.1.0/LICENSE
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
The first two messages are common to Erlang-related apps. They mean that we're
trying to install arch-independent data into arch-dependent directory.
Unfortunately that's how Erlang packages should be installed.
The last message means that I added license text as is, s/o touching/editing
it. I believe that it's a bad idea to change upstream-supplied licensing data.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list