[Bug 591389] Review Request: po-debconf - Tool for managing templates file translations with gettext

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 26 00:55:25 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591389

--- Comment #5 from Oron Peled <oron at actcom.co.il> 2010-10-25 20:55:24 EDT ---
New SPEC (Release: 4%dist):
  http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/po-debconf.spec
New SRPM:
  http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/po-debconf-1.0.16-4.fc13.src.rpm

Fixes and cleanups:
1. Non-specific License: GPL -> GPLv2
2. Replaced po-debconf-1.0.16-fix-prefix.patch with a
   bigger po-debconf-1.0.16-make-install.patch:
     * prefix appeared more than once (although the second time looked
       unused)
     * Added 'install' rule:
       - Refactored from debian/rules and our .spec file
       - Use the common DESTDIR=
       - Define and use common installation directories (prefix, bindir,
         datadir, etc.)
       - This should be pushed to upstream (Debian) so logic isn't duplicated.
         If they apply this, they can (optionally) streamline their
debian/rules
         [and then it may become good candidate for dh(1)]
3. Man pages:
     * Installation: was left outside of Makefile 'install' since debian
       (rightfully) use their dh_installman (no common code with Fedora)
     * Installation from .spec file was fixed:
       - Strip the language code from the file basename (foo.1 not foo.de.1)
       - Generalize so all man sections are installed, not only section 1

TODO:
   - Apply %find_lang logic?
   - Send Makefile patch upstream
   - Anything else?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list