[Bug 591389] Review Request: po-debconf - Tool for managing templates file translations with gettext
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 26 00:55:25 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591389
--- Comment #5 from Oron Peled <oron at actcom.co.il> 2010-10-25 20:55:24 EDT ---
New SPEC (Release: 4%dist):
http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/po-debconf.spec
New SRPM:
http://oron.fedorapeople.org/deb-package/po-debconf-1.0.16-4.fc13.src.rpm
Fixes and cleanups:
1. Non-specific License: GPL -> GPLv2
2. Replaced po-debconf-1.0.16-fix-prefix.patch with a
bigger po-debconf-1.0.16-make-install.patch:
* prefix appeared more than once (although the second time looked
unused)
* Added 'install' rule:
- Refactored from debian/rules and our .spec file
- Use the common DESTDIR=
- Define and use common installation directories (prefix, bindir,
datadir, etc.)
- This should be pushed to upstream (Debian) so logic isn't duplicated.
If they apply this, they can (optionally) streamline their
debian/rules
[and then it may become good candidate for dh(1)]
3. Man pages:
* Installation: was left outside of Makefile 'install' since debian
(rightfully) use their dh_installman (no common code with Fedora)
* Installation from .spec file was fixed:
- Strip the language code from the file basename (foo.1 not foo.de.1)
- Generalize so all man sections are installed, not only section 1
TODO:
- Apply %find_lang logic?
- Send Makefile patch upstream
- Anything else?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list