[Bug 226569] Merge Review: xorg-sgml-doctools

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 2 18:31:00 UTC 2010

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2010-09-02 14:30:59 EDT ---
== Review ==

- rpmlint checks return:

xorg-sgml-doctools.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
xorg-sgml-doctools.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
xorg-sgml-doctools.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
xorg-sgml-doctools.src: W: no-%clean-section

These are safe to ignore.

xorg-sgml-doctools.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package

Given that this package is really only useful for generating xorg docs, I think
it falls into the following exception:

"A reasonable exception is when the main package itself is a development tool
not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. "

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (noarch)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list