[Bug 630197] New: Review Request: ghc-safe - Library for safe (pattern match free) functions

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 4 01:30:15 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-safe - Library for safe (pattern match free) functions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630197

           Summary: Review Request: ghc-safe - Library for safe (pattern
                    match free) functions
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-safe/ghc-safe.spec
SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-safe/ghc-safe-0.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Partial functions from the base library, such as @head@ and
@!!@, modified to return more descriptive error messages,
programmer defined error messages, @Maybe@ wrapped results
and default values. These functions can be used to reduce the
number of unsafe pattern matches in your code.

% lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb
ghc-safe.src: W: strange-permission safe-0.2.tar.gz 0640L
ghc-safe.src: W: strange-permission ghc-safe.spec 0640L
ghc-safe-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-safe-devel
ghc-safe-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-safe-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/safe-0.2/libHSsafe-0.2_p.a
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list