[Bug 630274] New: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 4 15:31:00 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to efficiently append text

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630274

           Summary: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder - Builder to
                    efficiently append text
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-blaze-builder/ghc-blaze-builder.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-blaze-builder/ghc-blaze-builder-0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Builder to efficiently append text, optimized for HTML
generation. There is a small usage example in the
Text.Blaze.Builder.Core module, you should begin by reading
that.

% lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb
ghc-blaze-builder.src: W: strange-permission blaze-builder-0.1.tar.gz 0640L
ghc-blaze-builder.src: W: strange-permission ghc-blaze-builder.spec 0640L
ghc-blaze-builder-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-blaze-builder-devel
ghc-blaze-builder-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-blaze-builder-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/blaze-builder-0.1/libHSblaze-builder-0.1_p.a
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list