[Bug 630278] New: Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 4 15:56:33 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various functions on them
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630278
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ranges - Ranges and various
functions on them
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-ranges/ghc-ranges.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-ranges/ghc-ranges-0.2.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
Ranges and some functions allowing things like fast
membership lookup on ranges with holes in them and so on.
% lintmock fedora-14-x86_64-bb
ghc-ranges.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup -> lockup,
hookup, look up
ghc-ranges.src: W: strange-permission ranges-0.2.2.tar.gz 0640L
ghc-ranges.src: W: strange-permission ghc-ranges.spec 0640L
ghc-ranges.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup -> lockup,
hookup, look up
ghc-ranges-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup ->
lockup, hookup, look up
ghc-ranges-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-ranges-devel
ghc-ranges-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lookup ->
lockup, hookup, look up
ghc-ranges-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-ranges-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/ranges-0.2.2/libHSranges-0.2.2_p.a
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list