[Bug 629145] Review Request: ghc-cmdargs - Haskell command argument parsing

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Sep 6 22:15:03 UTC 2010

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> 2010-09-06 18:15:02 EDT ---
+ rpmlint output

$ rpmlint ghc-cmdargs*
ghc-cmdargs.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
ghc-cmdargs.src: W: strange-permission cmdargs-0.4.tar.gz 0640L
ghc-cmdargs.src: W: strange-permission ghc-cmdargs.spec 0640L
ghc-cmdargs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
ghc-cmdargs-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cmdargs-devel
ghc-cmdargs-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-cmdargs-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ latest version packaged

+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  33c45101ddb9c5f1ab996633744bdc7d  cmdargs-0.4.tar.gz
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tested using koji scratch build
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr
n/a package owns all directories it creates
n/a no duplicate files in %files
+ Package perserves timestamps on install
- Permissions on files must be set properly
  see rpmlint output
? %defattr line
  No way to tell as there is no %file manifest
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package runtime 
n/a header files should be in -devel
- static libraries should be in -static
  There is a .a file contained but its not clear from the haskell package
guidelines regarding this
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8


+ if there is no license file, packager should query upstream to include it
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
+ reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ non -devel packages should require fully versioned base
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
n/1 Package should have man files

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list