[Bug 631763] New: Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Sep 8 10:41:59 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763

           Summary: Review Request: zif - Simple wrapper for rpm
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: rhughes at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif-0.1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 
 * Zif is a simple yum-compatible library that only provides read-only
   access to the rpm database and the Fedora metadata for PackageKit.
 * Zif is not designed as a replacement to yum, nor to be used by end users.

Output of rpmlint:
zif.i686: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
zif.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libzif.so.1.0.1 exit at GLIBC_2.0
zif.i686: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man1/zif.1.gz 1: warning: macro
`\"' not defined
zif-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GLib -> G Lib, Glib, Gib
zif-devel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US GLib -> G Lib, Glib,
Gib
zif.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified
zif.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

KOJI build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2454609

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list