[Bug 226016] Merge Review: libgnomeprint22

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 9 09:03:25 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226016

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mclasen at redhat.com,
                   |                            |panemade at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> 2010-09-09 05:03:24 EDT ---
Review:
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164851

+ rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM.
libgnomeprint22.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devel -> delve,
devil, revel
libgnomeprint22.src:211: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_datadir}
libgnomeprint22.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
libgnomeprint22.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab:
line 14)
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devel -> delve,
devil, revel
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-clip.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-draft.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-multipage.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/libgnomeprintlpd.so ['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-select.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-rotate.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-frgba.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/libgnomeprintcups.so ['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/transports/libgnomeprint-file.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-zoom.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint-2-2.so.0.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-reverse.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/transports/libgnomeprint-custom.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-reorder.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/transports/libgnomeprint-lpr.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/libgnomeprint/2.18.7/modules/filters/libgnomeprint-position.so
['/usr/lib64']
libgnomeprint22.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/libgnomeprint22-2.18.7/NEWS
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 7 warnings.

+ source files match upstream url (sha1sum)
f7c550abacf22f602ca097f9033803bf9d4556de  libgnomeprint-2.18.7.tar.bz2

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present which is not needed now.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ libgnomeprint-2.2.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ ldconfig scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

Suggestions:
1) Maintainer can perform some cosmetic cleanups.
2) Following new changes can be implemented.
 a) %clean not needed
 b) cleaning of buildroot at start of %install also not needed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list