[Bug 632190] New: Review Request: erlang-amf - Erlang Action Message Format Library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 9 11:17:58 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: erlang-amf - Erlang Action Message Format Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632190
Summary: Review Request: erlang-amf - Erlang Action Message
Format Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-amf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-amf-0-0.1.20100908git27329144.fc12.src.rpm
Description: Erlang Action Message Format Library
This library is one of the requirements for erlyvideo.
Koji scratchbuilds:
F-13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2457251
EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2457254
rpmlint:
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint
../RPMS/ppc/erlang-amf-0-0.1.20100908git27329144.fc12.ppc.rpm
erlang-amf.ppc: E: explicit-lib-dependency erlang-stdlib
erlang-amf.ppc: E: no-binary
erlang-amf.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:
All the above messages should be ignored:
* explicit-lib-dependency is just a bogus message due to explicit dependency
on erlang-stdlib (note 'lib' in its name)
* no-binary - this package install in arch-specific path (required by main
Erlang/OTP framework), but in fact it's noarch
* only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - likewise
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list