[Bug 631972] Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972

--- Comment #3 from Nikolay Kim <nikolay at enfoldsystems.com> 2010-09-09 11:33:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> * The package 'plone', though retired, has already been in Fedora. You should
> request for surviving that package instead of submitting the same package with
> a different name.
> 
> Refer to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/plone

i think Plone 3 should have separate rpm because in many cases exact version of
plone is required. for most of our customers we are still using plone 3. also i
don't think split zope and plone is a good idea, each plone version require
exact zope version and python packages. 

> * You should submit the latest version of that package for review. The latest
> version of Plone is 4.0.
> 
> Refer to: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Plone/

we are willing to make plone4 rpm as well.

> * If you are sponsored, you may help updating Plone for epel5, which needs
> Plone 3.
> 
> Refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497933
> 

i can rename plone3 rpm to plone. but in any case plone 4 should have different
rpm name.

(In reply to comment #2)
> Packging plone is not an easy task, we still wait for the final release of zope
> 2.13 which is compatible with python 2.7.

i don't think using zope rpm for plone is good idea.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.