[Bug 595697] Review Request: ghc-regex-tdfa - Haskell "tagged" DFA regex engine

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697

--- Comment #9 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002 at gmail.com> 2010-09-17 16:40:59 EDT ---
Spec file

https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-regex-tdfa.spec?attredirects=0&d=1

Source rpm
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-regex-tdfa-1.1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1

There has been a version update from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4

Rpmlint output
ghc-regex-tdfa.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre -> libre,
Liberec, librate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre -> libre,
Liberec, librate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa.x86_64: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/regex-tdfa-1.1.4/libHSregex-tdfa-1.1.4-ghc6.12.1.so
The binary declares the stack as executable.  Executable stack is usually an
error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar
constructs which uses code on the stack.  One common source for needlessly
executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't
define a proper .note.GNU-stack section.

ghc-regex-tdfa-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre ->
libre, Liberec, librate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-regex-tdfa-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre ->
libre, Liberec, librate
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/regex-tdfa-1.1.4/libHSregex-tdfa-1.1.4_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.