[Bug 631972] Review Request: plone3 - Plone CMS

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972

--- Comment #11 from Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu at gmail.com> 2010-09-25 04:06:10 EDT ---
I would prefer to talk about Plone 4 at first.

I agree that it would be hard to maintain if we make a RPM for each application
level eggs. But if we build an all-in-one RPM for Plone, and a user want to
deploy a Zope configuration without Plone, then, shall we build another
all-in-one RPM for Zope or tell him to install the all-in-one Plone instead?

So, all-in-one bundles may be not acceptable. At this time, I may suggest to
separate that all-in-one RPM for Plone into several parts:

- ZTK
Packages in the ZTK collection is packaged RPMs per egg.

- ZODB
We have a RPM for the egg of ZODB3.

- Zope
A bundled RPM contains the eggs of Zope2 and all its dependencies other than
ZTK, ZODB and existing packages(like Paste).

- Plone
A bundled RPM contains, you know, others.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.