[Bug 630204] Review Request: ghc-mtlparse - Haskell mtlparse library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630204

Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |thomas.moschny at gmx.de

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny at gmx.de> 2010-09-26 05:23:50 EDT ---
Some remarks prior to a full review:

* Seems https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell is out of date. It
does not mention %ghc_lib_build, %ghc_lib_install or %ghc_lib_package, and has
broken links to cvs.fedoraproject.org and also broken links to
git.fedorahosted.org. Nevertheless, the specfile is auto-generated, and thus
mostly identical to spectemplate-ghc-lib.spec, so I'll assume it's ok.

* The aforementioned wiki page says: "When packaging things out of Hackage or
other sources, you may find that the summary or description is incomplete or
lacks detail. Please try to include an appropriate summary and adequate
description for Fedora of the library or program in the package so users will
know what it does." This is clearly missing here. Not even all three lines of
summary present in Hackage are included in the summary, but even those are a
bit thin.

* rpmlint says: ghc-mtlparse.x86_64: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtlparse-0.0.1/libHSmtlparse-0.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so - Could
that cause any problems, e.g. with selinux?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.