[Bug 689685] Review Request: Anchorman - The recording-studio-in-a-box

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685

Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)      |
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2011-04-18 15:25:37 EDT ---
1.
As mentioned in comment #6, 
BR: gcc-c++ 
should be dropped.

Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3009270

sources ok
ba211b882225cec7a85923b0d626ef57  anchorman-0.0.1.tar.gz


rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm
anchorman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam -> web cam,
web-cam, webcast
anchorman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast -> ice cast,
ice-cast, icecap
anchorman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam -> web cam,
web-cam, webcast
anchorman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast -> ice cast,
ice-cast, icecap
anchorman.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary anchorman
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

mostly harmless here.


licensing: ok
naming: ok
scriptlets: n/a

runtime:  naively running the binary (without option or webcam hardware
present), gives me a segfault, but we can let that slide being a very new
project.


otherwise, nice-n-simple source and packaging all around.  I won't block on
item 1 above, but would appreciate it being fixed prior to doing any official
builds.


APPROVED
(lifting NEEDSPONSOR)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.