[Bug 694287] Review Request: openCOLLADA - 3D import and export libraries

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694287

--- Comment #50 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> 2011-04-27 16:18:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> (In reply to comment #47)
> <snip>
> 
> > Done. While we on the subject of sub-packages. Should we also make a separate
> > -doc package?
> 
> No I don't think that is necessary, given that the docs are not all that large.
> (In reply to comment #48)
> > Went ahead and created a -doc package. 
> > 
> 
> Hehe, well if you prefer having the htdocs in a separate sub package that is
> fine. note that things like README and LICENSE must be in the main package
> though.

I figured since most people will not be direct users (this package will just be
a dependency of the program they are actually using), that it would be good to
separate the documentation.

Yup, I was careful to only move htdocs to the sub-package.


> > Also, I ran rpmlint on all the resulting packages and saw something new:
> > 
> > openCOLLADA-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
> > 
> 
> Ah, yes this is caused by you using cmake rather then %cmake when invoking
> cmake,
> I missed that. This causes rpm_opt_flags to not be used, causing this amongst
> other issues.

Fixed and rebuilding now. Between taking the smp_flags off and adding whatever
the cmake macro adds it's taking MUCH longer to build.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.