[Bug 697673] Review Request: sjinn - Simple tool for sending & receiving data from RS-232 devices

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 16:14:34 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697673

Mario Blättermann <mariobl at freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann <mariobl at freenet.de> 2011-04-29 12:14:33 EDT ---
$ rpmlint -v *
sjinn.src: I: checking
sjinn.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stty -> titty, atty, sty
sjinn.src: I: checking-url http://sjinn.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
sjinn.src: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sjinn/sjinn-1.01.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
sjinn.i686: I: checking
sjinn.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US stty -> titty, atty, sty
sjinn.i686: I: checking-url http://sjinn.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds)
sjinn.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/sjinn-1.01/COPYING
sjinn-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
sjinn-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://sjinn.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10
seconds)
sjinn-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/sjinn/rs232main.c
sjinn-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/sjinn/rs232ctl.c
sjinn-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/sjinn/rs232opts.c
sjinn.spec: I: checking-url
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sjinn/sjinn-1.01.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds)
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings.

Besides some "spelling errors" and the old FSF address, it looks good now.

-------------------------

PACKAGE APPROVED (again!)

-------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list