[Bug 675050] Review Request: cloudfs - Cloud Filesystem

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675050

Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
            Version|rawhide                     |16
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |
         AssignedTo|david at gnsa.us               |kkeithle at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review?
           Keywords|                            |Reopened

--- Comment #27 from Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> 2011-08-08 10:07:04 EDT ---
Re-review after package name change from CloudFS to HekaFS

rpmlint SPECS/hekafs.spec SRPMS/hekafs-0.7-7.fc15.src.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/hekafs-0.7-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm
hekafs.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
hekafs.src: W: invalid-license AGPLv3+
hekafs.x86_64: W: invalid-license AGPLv3+
hekafs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided cloudfs
hekafs.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.2.1/xlator/features/libmaprbtree.so
hekafs.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/hekafs
hekafs.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/hekafsd $prog
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

cloudfs never shipped, so nothing ever provided cloudfs and the Obsoletes is
only for for possible truth-and-beauty and the few early adopters and as such
I'm not sure I see the value of having a 'Provides: cloudfs'

Successful koji scratch builds of x86_64 and i686.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.