[Bug 731191] Review Request: libspnav - Open source alternative to 3DConnextion drivers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Aug 17 13:00:47 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731191
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> 2011-08-17 09:00:46 EDT ---
naming: ok
license: BSD, ok
sources: ok
b85a0f4ab711e2d4f73a40e2e371f5ae libspnav-0.2.2.tar.gz
scriptlets: ok
1. MUST: build doesn't use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. maybe use something like:
--- configure.opt 2011-08-17 07:47:12.275486930 -0500
+++ configure 2011-08-17 07:52:24.599256027 -0500
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
fi
if [ "$OPT" = 'yes' ]; then
- echo 'opt = -O3' >>Makefile
+ echo 'opt = -O3 $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS)' >>Makefile
fi
if [ "$X11" = 'yes' ]; then
2. MUST. static library build/packaged. Please provide
justification/rationale for doing so, or remove it.
3. SHOULD. In %files, be explicit about what soname to package, so future abi
bumps don't come as a surprise, use something like
%files
%{_libdir}/libspnav.so.0*
instead?
4. SHOULD. Given all the configure/makefile hacks (optflags, DESTDIR, lib64)
in the .spec, I'm wondering if it may be more worthwhile to make an
upstreamable patch instead? I can help do that, if that's agreeable with you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list