[Bug 732585] New: Review Request: nodejs-nopt - Node.js option parsing

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 02:00:38 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: nodejs-nopt - Node.js option parsing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732585

           Summary: Review Request: nodejs-nopt - Node.js option parsing
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: tchollingsworth at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com,
                    package-review at lists.fedoraproject.org
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: ---


Spec URL: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/nodejs-nopt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~tchol/fedora/nodejs-nopt-1.0.6-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description: An option parsing library for Node.js and its package manager
(npm).

$ rpmlint SPECS/nodejs-nopt.spec 
SPECS/nodejs-nopt.spec: W: no-%build-section
SPECS/nodejs-nopt.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
isaacs-nopt-v1.0.6-0-gc36e3cd.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/nodejs-nopt-1.0.6-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 
nodejs-nopt.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-nopt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-nopt.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US npm -> pm, rpm, ppm
nodejs-nopt.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
nodejs-nopt.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nopt.js
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list