[Bug 732636] New: Review Request: nodejs-graceful-fs - 'fs' module with incremental back-off on EMFILE

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 07:13:17 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: nodejs-graceful-fs - 'fs' module with incremental back-off on EMFILE

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732636

           Summary: Review Request: nodejs-graceful-fs - 'fs' module with
                    incremental back-off on EMFILE
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: tchollingsworth at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com,
                    package-review at lists.fedoraproject.org
    Classification: Fedora
      Story Points: ---
              Type: ---


Spec URL: <spec info here>
SRPM URL: <srpm info here>
Description:
Just like node.js' fs module, but it does an incremental back-off when EMFILE
is
encountered.  Useful in asynchronous situations where one needs to try to open
lots and lots of files.

(npm dependency)

$ rpmlint SPECS/nodejs-graceful-fs.spec 
SPECS/nodejs-graceful-fs.spec: W: no-%build-section
SPECS/nodejs-graceful-fs.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
isaacs-node-graceful-fs-9d7cd98.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/nodejs-graceful-fs-1.0.0-1.fc15.noarch.rpm 
nodejs-graceful-fs.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis,
ks, j
nodejs-graceful-fs.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list