[Bug 226359] Merge Review: rdist

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 13:45:51 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226359

--- Comment #2 from Vojtech Vitek <vvitek at redhat.com> 2011-08-23 09:45:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>  NO rdist-eu-license.txt - no longer exist, now
> http://www.magnicomp.com/rdist/rdist-eu-license.shtml
Fixed.

> NO specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
> -- buildprereq is deprecated
s/BuildPreReq/BuildRequires/ (it is tag, not macro, btw)

> NO package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
> -- YES after changing BuildPreReq to BuildRequires  
Ok now.

> NO rpmlint is silent.
> $ rpmlint rdist.spec 
> rdist.spec:33: E: buildprereq-use byacc bison
> rdist.spec: E: specfile-error warning: line 33: buildprereq is deprecated:
> BuildPreReq: byacc bison
> 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
> rdist.spec: W: invalid-url Source1:
> http://www.magnicomp.com/rdist/rdist-eu-license.txt HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> 
> $ rpmlint rdist-6.1.5-51.fc17.src.rpm
> rdist.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Maintains identical copies of files on
> multiple machines.
> rdist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtime -> mime, time, m time
> rdist.src:33: E: buildprereq-use byacc bison
> rdist.src: E: specfile-error warning: line 33: buildprereq is deprecated:
> BuildPreReq: byacc bison
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
> $ rpmlint rdist-6.1.5-51.fc17.x86_64.rpm 
> rdist.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Maintains identical copies of files
> on multiple machines.
> rdist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mtime -> mime, time, m
> time
> rdist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/rdist-6.1.5/rdist-licensing-email.txt
> rdist.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary oldrdist
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Fixed.

> Notes:
> Maybe put oldrdist in its own package.
This would break the backward-compatibility -Server option. See man rdist(1).

> Licence change to BSD is based only on copy of email, I am not sure if it is
> OK.
Re-license granted by the original author, thus OK.


Is there anything else, Lukas?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list