[Bug 730559] Review Request: drupal7-date - Date content type and APIs for Drupal 7

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730559

Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(jaredsmith at jareds
                   |                            |mith.net)

--- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> 2011-08-26 16:02:48 EDT ---
$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal7-date.spec
rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal7-date-2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.src.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal7-date-2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.noarch.rpm 
drupal7-date.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0-alpha3
['2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15', '2.0-0.1.alpha3']
drupal7-date.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/drupal7-date-2.0/LICENSE.txt
drupal7-date.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/drupal7/modules/date/help/date-views.html
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.

The warning can be fixed by using one of the correct versions.  (I prefer the
second since you can then reuse the content for other branches more easily.)

The first error should be reported upstream, but you can use a current copy of
the correct LICENSE file from the FSF, since upstream intent is clear (GPLv2+).

The second can be corrected with a 'find | xargs rm -f' -- some existing D6
modules are using this as well.  Make sure the existence of the file in
question isn't required for the module to run properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.