[Bug 720435] Review Request: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr - Drivers for Epson inkjet printers

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Aug 27 22:04:54 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720435

Thomas Sailer <t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch

--- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch> 2011-08-27 18:04:53 EDT ---
What use is the devel package exactly? Can the library be used without header
files?

Fedora review epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4-2.1lsb3.2.fc15.src.rpm
2011-08-27

+ OK
! needs attention

+ rpmlint output
  The rpmlint warnings/errors listed above can be ignored and are normal
  for octave forge packages
+ Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
  GPLv2+
+ License matches the actual package license
+ The package contains the license file
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  49fb339fe9f164dea89ce8ceb07db43d 
srpm/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4-1lsb3.2.src.rpm
  49fb339fe9f164dea89ce8ceb07db43d 
upstream/epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1.0.4-1lsb3.2.src.rpm

+ Package scratch-builds
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
! Header files should be in -devel
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8

Please notify upstream about the outdated FSF address

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list