[Bug 765651] Review Request: asterisk-gui - Graphical interface for Asterisk configuration

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Dec 12 04:54:34 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765651

--- Comment #2 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper.le.fantom at gmail.com> 2011-12-11 23:54:33 EST ---
Hello,

(In reply to comment #1)
> instead of use %{_sharedstatedir}/asterisk/*
> i think it is better to use:
> - %{_sharedstatedir}asterisk/static-http/
> - %{_sharedstatedir}/asterisk/scripts
> - %{_sharedstatedir}/asterisk/gui_backups
Done

> SRPMS: [OK]
> $ rpmlint asterisk-gui-2.0-1.20111208svn5218.fc16.src.rpm
> asterisk-gui.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
> asterisk-gui-2.0-20111208svn5218.tar.gz
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> 
> they are many warning and error with:
> $ rpmlint asterisk-gui.spec
> 
> could you fix this?
Done

So, this is the latest release:
Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-gui.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-gui-2.0-2.20111212svn5218.fc16.src.rpm

$ rpmlint *.rpm
asterisk-gui.noarch: E: zero-length
/var/lib/asterisk/static-http/config/blank.html
asterisk-gui.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/asterisk-gui-2.0/COPYING
asterisk-gui.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
asterisk-gui-2.0-20111212svn5218.tar.xz
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.

/var/lib/asterisk/static-http/config/blank.html is needed by the program
incorrect-fsf-address -> I'm asking with upstram to fix it

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list