[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820

--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> 2011-02-01 04:37:57 EST ---
Btw. I did not mentioned it here before, but according to Ruby Packaging
Guidelines: 

"If the same Ruby library is to be packaged for use as a Gem and as a straight
Ruby library without Gem support, it must be packaged as a Gem first. To make
it available to code that does not use Ruby Gems, a subpackage called
ruby-%{gemname} must be created in the rubygem-%{gemname} package such that"

We already have ruby-rdoc package, so this package does not follow the
guidelines precisely. I know they should not conflict, they are designed to
work side by side, I just believe I should note it here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.