[Bug 672629] Review Request: perl-Perl-Critic-Tics - Policies for things that make me wince

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> 2011-02-04 10:53:11 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > This is Fedora specific issue, not upstr(In reply to comment #3)
> > > 
> > > Upstream perl reference please.
> > >
> > This is Fedora effort, not upstream one.
No. vendor_dir is an upstream perl invention => it must have a meaning.

> > > If what you say applies, this would be a fundamential change in fedora's
> > > perl-packaging policy, because so far, it had been convention to consider
> > > "Fedora" == "vendor".
> > >
> > Convention, not a policy.
Irrelevant - You are nit-picking on words.

What matters here, is considency of the Fedora distribution and simplicity of
packaging.

> > The location is not standardized in Perl Packaging
> > Guidelines. This has been decided by `perl' package owner (mmaslano) about half
> > year ago.
Yes, you single-sidedly decided something very arguable and have caused
Fedora's perl packaging to be inconsistent.

> I wrote a proposal, not a policy.
You did not write a proposal. You documented what you decided and implemented.

> No-one commented it yet, I'd like to take
> this issue back to our mailing list to discuss.
Provided what has happened, I an not sure such discussion makes much sense.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.