[Bug 674152] Review Request: mingw32-matahari - Matahari QMF Agents for Windows guests
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 16 13:21:43 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674152
Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> 2011-02-16 08:21:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
> produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1]
>
> Needs this output
I think you're supposed to provide that but here it is anyway:
mingw32-matahari.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovirt ->
overt, oviduct, oviform
mingw32-matahari.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qpid -> quid,
sapid, rapid
mingw32-matahari.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ovirt -> overt,
oviduct, oviform
mingw32-matahari.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US qpid -> quid,
sapid, rapid
mingw32-matahari.src: W: invalid-url Source0: matahari-matahari-060266b.tgz
mingw32-matahari.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: matahari-matahari-060266b.tgz
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
The spelling errors are wrong and the spec explains how to obtain the tarball.
[snip]
> MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
> Licensing Guidelines .
> MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
> [3]
>
> Needs GPLv2+
Fixed.
SRPM:
http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/mingw32-matahari-0.4.0-0.12.060266b.git.fc14.src.rpm
SPEC: http://www.clusterlabs.org/~beekhof/mingw32-matahari.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list