[Bug 673839] Review Request: boost141 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 17 22:00:57 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839

Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)            |

--- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> 2011-02-17 17:00:55 EST ---
A quick audit shows:

Boost: too many to list
MIT: boost/multi_array/algorithm.hpp
boost/interprocess/sync/interprocess_barrier.hpp
boost/interprocess/sync/emulation/interprocess_recursive_mutex.hpp
boost/interprocess/sync/interprocess_mutex.hpp
boost/interprocess/sync/interprocess_recursive_mutex.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/list.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/map.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/vector.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/set.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/slist.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/string.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/detail/flat_tree.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/detail/tree.hpp
boost/interprocess/containers/container/deque.hpp
boost/interprocess/streams/vectorstream.hpp
boost/interprocess/streams/bufferstream.hpp boost/interprocess/detail/move.hpp
boost/wave/util/flex_string.hpp
boost/program_options/detail/utf8_codecvt_facet.hpp
boost/multi_index/ordered_index.hpp boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_node.hpp
boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_ops.hpp boost/graph/kolmogorov_max_flow.hpp
boost/graph/write_dimacs.hpp boost/function/detail/gen_maybe_include.pl
boost/intrusive/rbtree_algorithms.hpp boost/detail/limits.hpp
boost/detail/binary_search.hpp boost/detail/algorithm.hpp
libs/interprocess/test/condition_test_template.hpp 
libs/interprocess/test/util.hpp libs/interprocess/test/mutex_test_template.hpp 
boost/shared_container_iterator.hpp boost/rational.hpp 

BSD: libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_6_027.cpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_6_005.cpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_5_009.cpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_6_064.cpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_6_009.cpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_5_035_11.hpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_5_022.cpp
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/t_6_011.cpp (and several more testfiles in
libs/wave/test/testwave/testfiles/ that I got tired of enumerating)

Python: boost/python/detail/python22_fixed.h

So, there are four licenses in play here: Boost, MIT, BSD, and Python

The BSD files are only involved in the libs/wave/test code, which I do not
believe end up being packaged in any way (don't get built into a binary or
library either).

The Python file is only used for the python bindings.

So, the overall license tag should be: License: Boost and MIT

The -python subpackage should be: License: Boost and MIT and Python

Lifting FE-Legal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list