[Bug 670608] Review Request: libgaiagraphics - Graphics canvas for GIS rendering

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 18 13:40:14 UTC 2011

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |martin.gieseking at uos.de

--- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> 2011-02-18 08:40:13 EST ---
In addition to Mario's informal review:

- According to the source file headers, libgaiagraphics is licensed under 
  LGPLv3+. File COPYING contains the GPLv3 license text. Please adapt the 
  License field and ask upstream to provide the correct license text with the

- I recommend to use macro %{version} in Source0 to simplify future updates.

- Add a short comment above Patch0 telling what the patch does.

- Please be more specific in %files, especially if only single files are added.
  This helps to prevent accidentally packaging unwanted files:


- If you want to maintain the package for EPEL < 6 too, add
  Requires: pkgconfig to the -devel subpackage. Otherwise, you can drop all 
  the buildroot stuff.

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-14-i386/result/*.rpm
libgaiagraphics.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Libgaigraphics ->
Stratigraphical, Calligraphic, Stratigraphic
libgaiagraphics.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib/libgaiagraphics.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0
libgaiagraphics.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Libgaigraphics ->
Stratigraphical, Calligraphic, Stratigraphic
libgaiagraphics-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

- fix the spelling error as per Mario's comment
- shared-lib-calls-exit can be ignored but should possibly be fixed upstream
- no-documentation is expected and can be ignored

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list