[Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 19 22:30:08 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320
--- Comment #24 from Stewart Adam <s.adam at diffingo.com> 2011-02-19 17:30:00 EST ---
SPEC: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/boxbackup.spec
SRPM:
http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SRPMS/boxbackup-0.11-0.4.rc8.fc14.src.rpm
I have changed the License tag to "Box Backup GPL", which is the name upstream
gave for the GPLv2-like license with the linking exceptions for OpenSSL and MS
VSS. This makes rpmlint output a new warning:
boxbackup.src: W: invalid-license Box Backup GPL
Although I believe we can ignore this as spot gave the OK. Perhaps we ask him
to look it over quickly again just to be sure?
As for the ownership of /etc/boxbackup, the troublesome part is that both the
client and the server packages store their files in sub-directories of
/etc/boxbackup so I've made both packages own it.
rpmlint also complains about this:
boxbackup.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/boxbackup boxbackup
boxbackup.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/boxbackup 0700L
I've done used nonstandard permissions (boxbackup:root 0700) to prevent outside
users from taking peeks at the backup configuration (for either the client or
server) or from gaining access to the certificates/encryption keys.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list