[Bug 666954] Review Request: cherrytree - Hierarchical note taking application

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 4 08:52:05 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666954

Christoph Wickert <cwickert at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |1

--- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert at fedoraproject.org> 2011-01-04 03:52:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> /usr/share/cherrytree/glade/cherrytree.glade.h seems not necessary to be
> installed.
> 
> The latest changelog is missed.

Both fixed, thanks

> And please paste the output of rpmlint run on all the rpms.

I always though this is part of the review when the reviewer tests is the
package builds in mock, otherwise a requester can post 'faked' rpmlint output
here. But here you are:

rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/cherrytree-0.19-2.fc15.*
cherrytree.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, cml, ml
cherrytree.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctd -> cts, ct, cd
cherrytree.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cherrytree
cherrytree.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, cml, ml
cherrytree.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctd -> cts, ct, cd
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

(In reply to comment #3)
> ASCII double quote is preferred in description like ".ctd".

Fixed, was a left over from copy & paste from the website.

SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree.spec
SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/cherrytree-0.19-2.fc15.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list