[Bug 665190] Review Request: perl-List-UtilsBy - Higher-order list utility functions

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665190

Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mmaslano at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2011-01-06 08:30:28 EST ---
- rpmlint:
rpmlint perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc15.src.rpm 
W: spelling-error %description -l en_US behaviour -> behavior, behave, behalves
^ that's not American English, but seems to me rude changing description from
British author to something else. Therefore OK
W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Util -> Til, U til, Utile
^ nonsense
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
^ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2704543
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK

rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
perl-List-UtilsBy = 0.06-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/noarch/perl-List-UtilsBy-0.06-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1

ACCEPT

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.