[Bug 669311] New: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 13 10:01:37 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311
Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short
summary here>
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pavel at zhukoff.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/mupdf/mupdf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://landgraf.fedorapeople.org/packages/requested/mupdf/mupdf-0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm
mock: ok
koji: none because depends on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/668959
Description:
MuPDF is a lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C.
The renderer in MuPDF is tailored for high quality anti-aliased
graphics. MuPDF renders text with metrics and spacing accurate to
within fractions of a pixel for the highest fidelity in reproducing
the look of a printed page on screen.
MuPDF has a small footprint. A binary that includes the standard
Roman fonts is only one megabyte. A build with full CJK support
(including an Asian font) is approximately five megabytes.
MuPDF has support for all non-interactive PDF 1.7 features, and the
toolkit provides a simple API for accessing the internal structures of
the PDF document. Example code for navigating interactive links and
bookmarks, encrypting PDF files, extracting fonts, images, and
searchable text, and rendering pages to image files is provided.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list