[Bug 669311] Review Request: mupdf - A lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 14 08:18:58 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669311
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2011-01-14 03:18:57 EST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Jussi,
> I have NOT mixed %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, or %{optflags} and
> $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in my packages.
I know.
(In reply to comment #11)
> Jason, I read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines (MUST:
> Each package must consistently use macros.). After this I've replaced all my
> foo to %{__foo}. Is it wrong? I'll fix if It's
It's not wrong, it's just bad style since it makes spec files a lot harder to
read (Jason put it aptly in comment #9 ).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list