[Bug 668052] Review Request: libtpms - Library providing Trusted Platform Module (TPM) functionality
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 14 10:07:20 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668052
Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |tmraz at redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?,
| |needinfo?(stefanb at us.ibm.co
| |m)
--- Comment #1 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> 2011-01-14 05:07:17 EST ---
There are multiple problems with the package.
For the first look:
1. Only a static library is built. Fedora discourages shipping static libraries
except for well defined cases. The biggest problem is then if you want to
add/modify a package in Fedora that would use this static library. You would
have to obtain explicit exception from FESCo to allow this. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
I suggest to modify the build process of libtpms to create shared libraries if
there are not really compelling reasons why it shouldn't or can't be done.
2. RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not properly passed to compiler during the build.
3. This is only a cosmetic issue - the tarball unpacks to a src directory. It
is confusing when you look it up in the BUILD directory of rpmbuild, can you
either create a libtpms directory first and unpack the tarball inside it with
%setup or rename the src directory after the unpacking?
4. Another cosmetic issue - use %setup -q option.
5. Please add an appropriate URL tag.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list