[Bug 593559] Review Request: protobuf-c - C bindings for Google's Protocol Buffers

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 17 18:52:58 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593559

--- Comment #16 from Bobby Powers <bobby at laptop.org> 2011-01-17 13:52:56 EST ---
Created attachment 473912
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=473912
updated srpm

I've updated and minimally tested the attached srpm (built with mock for i686
and x86_64), as updated.  The patch is below, not sure which is more useful.

--- protobuf-c.spec~ 2011-01-17 10:47:33.196403047 -0800
+++ protobuf-c.spec 2011-01-17 10:34:00.965444275 -0800
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:           protobuf-c
-Version:        0.13
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Version:        0.14
+Release:        1%{?dist}
 Summary:        C bindings for Google's Protocol Buffers

 Group:          Development/Libraries
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 Summary:        Protocol Buffers C headers and libraries
 Group:          Development/Libraries
 Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires:       protobuf-devel

 %description devel
 This package contains protobuf-c headers and libraries
@@ -31,9 +30,7 @@

 %build
 %configure --disable-static
-# Causes build to fail
-#make %{?_smp_mflags}
-make
+make %{?_smp_mflags}

 %check
 make check
@@ -59,8 +56,14 @@
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %{_includedir}/google/protobuf-c
 %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-c.so
+%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libprotobuf-c.pc

 %changelog
+* Mon Jan 17 2011 Bobby Powers <bobby at laptop.org> 0.14-1
+- New upstream release
+- Removed -devel dependency on protobuf-devel
+- Small specfile cleanups
+
 * Wed May 19 2010 David Robinson <zxvdr.au at gmail.com> 0.13-2
 - Spec file cleanup

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list