[Bug 670090] Review Request: bicon - Bidirectional Console

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 18 02:39:32 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670090

--- Comment #4 from fujiwara <tfujiwar at redhat.com> 2011-01-17 21:39:31 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm trying to review.

Thanks. I updated spec file:
Spec URL: http://fujiwara.fedorapeople.org/bicon/bicon.spec
SRPM URL: http://fujiwara.fedorapeople.org/bicon/bicon-0.2.0-2.fc15.src.rpm

Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2727535


>  bicon.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/share/doc/bicon-0.2.0/README 0600L
>  bicon.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/share/doc/bicon-0.2.0/COPYING 0600L
>  bicon.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/share/doc/bicon-0.2.0/AUTHORS 0600L

I didn't get the same error with my scratch build but I added chmod at the
moment.

> - consider having a separate package for fonts
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages
> 
> I think this might not apply since the package contains only 4 fonts and each
> of them is about 4KB, but if you plan to subpackage them, you could check
> terminus-fonts-console.

OK, I think probably sub-packages are good because fonts and keymaps are not
used in TERM=xterm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list